Links and comments for university students of English, and of British Studies and British history. Study links connected with my classes, and general links on current affairs etc. There are sometimes indications as to what group might be particularly interested (L2 for Licence 2nd year, for example)
You will
find here the final video chapter in the series on Social and Cultural Changes
in the 1970s in the UK.
And you will
find here an article « Aspects of Popular Culture in the 1970s »,
which originally appeared as a chapter in a book.
https://hal-normandie-univ.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02480723/document
If you have questions about the assignment, send me an email.
You may need
to look over these posts on commenting « textes de civilisation »,
which concentrate in particular in how such exercises are completely different
from literary commentaries
John
Mullen, Université de Rouen - Teaching blog: L3 DST popular culture
(johncmullen.blogspot.com)
and
Reminder :
The
questions you always need to ask yourself for each document, before you begin
to write your commentary, are the following.
WHO? (is
expressing themselves)
TO WHOM?
(are they trying to communicate)
WHEN? (What
is important about the fact that it was at this time and not another?)
WHAT? (is
the essential content of the document? Also, what do they NOT say which we
might expect them to say?)
WHY? (are
they saying all this: what is their objective?)
HOW? (do
they try to reach their objective? Irony? Mockery? Rhetorical devices?)
WHAT
HAPPENED AFTER? (If the document promises, or predicts or warns, did these
elements come true?)
HOW TYPICAL
IS THE DOCUMENT? (Is it an innovative declaration of a new movement, or one
more cliché from that time period, or what?)
WHAT
DIFFERENCE DID IT MAKE? (Where does the document fit in to longer historical
processes?)
In any
exercise you are unlikely to find something to say on every one of the above
questions for each document, but the list gives you an idea of where you should
be looking.
Reminder :
Analysis of vocabulary/ style/ lexical fields. These can occasionally be
useful to help explain the objective of a document and how that objective is
attained. However, listing words used without saying why this is useful is a
mistake. I should say that at least 80% of the time, when I see the expression « lexical
field » in a commentary on a civilisation document, it is not good.
Reminder:
Journalistic
English often makes a paragraph with just one sentence. In a university essay,
this is not sufficient - a paragraph should have at the very minimum three
sentences. On the other hand, I just corrected a script where the student had
used a paragraph which was 54 lines long (893 words). This is much too long for
a paragraph, and it could easily have been cut in three or four.
Reminder :
Take time to
think about the objective of the author of each document: this needs
to be at the centre of your analysis. Talk about the objective of each document
from the very first time you mention it.
Reminder :
Students
often quote the documents too much. This takes up a lot of valuable time. You may
quote from the documents a particularly important phrase, or a particularly
difficult phrase, to help you explain. It is not a good idea to quote
dozens of phrases.
I will be posting here in the next few days detailed comments concerning the commentary some of you did on a speech by Tony Benn. Everyone should look carefully at this, even if they did not do the commentary, because questions of method will be front and centre. Here is that document again.
(…) I want to talk
about the role of the BBC as the prime national instrument in broadcasting. I
am not proposing direct Government control of the mass media, to which I
would be wholly opposed. Nor am I making, for the purpose of this argument, any
complaint of political bias. Arguments about political balance are quite
separate and ought to be conducted quite separately from any debate on the
future of mass communications.
Broadcasting should
be used, to the full, to help individual men and women to live useful and full
lives. That is to say that, in its broadest sense, communications should serve
the people and not become their master. But if it is to do so, it has to make
available the sort of information and programmes which are really relevant to
human needs. These needs include the need to be entertained, the need to be
informed and the need to be educated. The original BBC charter recognized this.
Now, a new dimension
has to be added to this basic requirement. This is the need for helping us to
adjust to the enormous changes which are occurring in society, and which are
far greater for this generation than for any generation that has ever gone
before it. We therefore have to add a new criterion relating to the method. If
the broadcasting organisations are to perform their task, they must allow us to
meet our objectives by talking to each other. Availability of access to the
mass media becomes an integral part of the operational requirement.
Looking back over the
history of the BBC, the general level of information, education and culture has
risen sharply. It has also given pleasure to millions of people by bringing
them entertainment, sporting events, drama and music. Criticisms must be set in
the balance against these formidable achievements and a record of service to
the public which is widely recognised and appreciated.
However, in recent
years, this objectivity has been replaced by a growing tendency to personalise
news presentation. The news reader has almost become a commentator; the gap
between news and comment has greatly narrowed. This tendency to
personalisation, carrying with it editorial powers exercised by individual
commentators, has even more serious implications for other types of programmes.
The BBC retains,
either on the staff or on contract, a whole host of commentators who, being
quite free to comment, carry with them some inevitable suggestion of BBC
authority. True, the BBC, through its board of Governors, has no collective
view on public matters and very rarely issues a statement of any kind. But
listeners and viewers have come to expect from certain well-known broadcasters
a particular line of thought which is peculiar to them, but which, though the
power of the medium, inevitably shapes public thinking.
Nobody wants to go
back to the earlier tradition. Quite the reverse. What is wrong is that
availability of access is still too restricted in that it is almost limited to
a few hundred broadcasters, chosen by the BBC.
First, in respect of
the choice of subjects: Britain has thousands of problems which would merit the
attention of the broadcasting authorities. Certain ones are regularly picked
out for treatment. They include the most important, but do not by any means
cover all those that are important. The choice is supposedly influenced by the
interests of the mass audience and it is here that the influence of the
programme ratings begins to be felt. It would be surprising if the sort of
subjects that are guaranteed to get a large audience in the popular newspapers
were not effective on the radio or TV. This is exactly what is happening.
Second, in respect of
the presentation of the subject. Here too, the influence of the ratings is very
strong and so is the pressure of time. Important subjects are skimped,
important discussions are telescoped and conflicts are artificially sharpened.
The result is inevitably to make for triviality and superficiality,
over-simplifying what is immensely complicated and sensationalizing almost
everything that is touched on.
Third, by choice of
people. Any BBC producer soon learns that a certain sort of person will give
him just what he wants (…)
Tony Benn, 18 October 1968 in: Benn, Tony, Office Without
Power: Diaries 1968-72, Arrow Books, London, 1989 (1988), pp. 107-109.
You will find here chapter five in the video series on the timeline
And chapter six is here
Je vous demande de reproduire ce tableau, et me le renvoyer, après le dernier cours, d'ici quelques mois avec une signature pour chaque fois que vous étiez présent e. Ce n'est pas pour vous surveiller, mais pour assurer que je serai payé!
Agrégation interne Compréhension orale John Mullen Feuille de présence individuelle |
||
Date |
Signature |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This seminar concentrates on the history of the book. Two friends of mine are speaking.
Le thème de recherche "Le texte et sa postérité" ("Texts & Their Afterlives"), (LERMA, UR 853, Aix-Marseille Université), organise un séminaire destiné notamment aux agrégatifs, sur les journaux de James Cook. Il aura lieu lundi 1er mars, de 16h30 à 18h30. Nous aurons le plaisir d'accueillir: Sandhya Patel (IHRIM-Université-Clermont-Auvergne) The Lives and Afterlives of Cook's Logs and Journals Jean-Stéphane Massiani, (Lycée Nelson Mandela, Marseille) From the Ship to the Pen: James Cook as a Writer in the Making L'inscription au séminaire se fait avant le 28/02/21 à 17h, sur Eventbrite: https://www.eventbrite.co.uk/e/141533890677 L'invitation Zoom sera envoyée aux inscrit(e)s après la fermeture des inscriptions. |
Here are the two archives I mentioned today. I also said that you have until the end of the semester (week 12) to send me your work.
The ecologist https://www.resurgence.org/magazine/issue58-.html
(You have to create an account, but it is free).
The advertising archives https://www.advertisingarchives.co.uk/index.php?service=search&action=do_quick_search&language=en&q=1971
And here is the video lecture we looked at in class
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lOhkaGTTO_8&
[If possible, come with comments or even questions about the timeline videos.
If you had to omit some of the elements I mentioned in the video, which might you omit and why?
What other types of element could be included?
If you were employed to establish a museum exhibition on Britain in the 1970s, what title would you give it and what might you exhibit?]
You will find here the first two chapters of the online
videos, which will remain online for months.
I have already sent you links to these videos. There will be more videos over the next few weeks, so check back here regularly.
You will find here an example of student work done in a previous year. This was a good piece.
http://www.jcmullen.fr/0220samplehw.pdf
You will find here chapter three of the Timeline videos
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b5mX1D6ARB4
More information in a few days.
For all of the questions on the "civilisation" section of the agrégation, knowing the framing document very well is essential. In class tomorrow, I will be looking at the main points in the framing document on James Cook. This will help us understand what questions can come up, and how to deal with them. We will look briefly at a couple of questions which came up last year. Try to find a moment to read over the document before the class:
https://saesfrance.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/programme-agreg-ext-2021.pdf (section on Cook)
One student came up with a fantastic mnemonic to memorize the order and names of the commissions!
"Some Charming Student Used His Brewed Potion And Progressed!"
You can read the introduction of an important book on the 1970s here. I will be beginning to look at this document in class on Wednesday.
mardi 15h
M2 seminar on the 1970s.
Link here shortly before.
Article here in a day or two.
mercredi 10h30
Thème agrégation.
Link here shortly before.
We will be working on the passage by Philippe Djian.
mercredi 13h
Capes interne
Link by mail shortly before.
mercredi 15h
James Cook
Link here shortly before.
The class will be a little longer than the last one.
2 mars à 18h
Conférence Zoom de Darrell Newton, spécialiste des médias, du recrutement et de la représentation des minorités visibles à la télévision britannique, qui est par ailleurs Provost à Winona State University (Minnesota).
Profil : https://www.winona.edu/academic/provost.aspWatch at least part of each of these: we will be talking about them in class
Gay Pride 1979 https://youtu.be/YV_h2FoQJxs
Back in time for Brixton: the 1970s. https://youtu.be/G6RAhpUOu4w
Tuesday 2nd Feb at 3pm
Class of M2 seminar "Social and Cultural Changes in the UK in the 1970s" (Link here shortly before). Please read the two articles posted on this blog a few days back.
Wednesday 3rd Feb
10.30am Translation class for agrégation students. (Link here shortly before). Note we will be working on the passage from Les Onze about paintings. I will return to you before the class my comments on the translations of this passage which you have sent me.
1.30 pm (Link by mail) CAPES interne comprehension class.
Note on BBC classes
Because the text commentary is not one of the written exercises for the Agrégation Interne, I left the correction of your text commentaries on Benn's speech on the BBC until last in my pile of scripts to mark. I will be looking at this in the next couple of weeks (watch this space).
Note on James Cook classes at Rouen; The first videos (about the first expedition) will be sent to you in the next few days - these are to complement the live classes we have. For complicated reasons, I need to send these to you by mail. I have on my list Charlotte, Robin, Karine, Joséphine, Nathalie, Fiona and Isabelle. If I have forgotten you, you can send me an email - that would be very useful.